![]() Google has fabricated users to think they have more control over data privacy, Amanda Bonn, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs group, explained to the judge. In this latest lawsuit, Google is said to have relied on snippets of code contained in an advertising and analytics service website to delete users’ private browsing history but still silently sent them to the host server. Most notably, she forced Google to reveal how to scan emails to build profiles and set up ads. Previously, Koh had a “deep feud” with Google as a privacy policy critic. ![]() Most of the allegations are that Google is abusing its dominance in digital advertising and online search to compete unfairly. Over the years, Google has become the target of antitrust complaints in the eyes of authorities, businesses or individuals and organizations. ![]() Considering the possibilities that Google dismissed the lawsuit, Koh said it would be strange if the company thinks it does not use personal information to build user profiles and generate ads for additional income. Lawsuit for damages 5,000 USD privacy has been compromised for each user in the millions of plaintiffs since June 2016. Accordingly, a class action lawsuit alleging commitments and promises about Google’s private browsing mode is not true. collected from users or not.Īt a hearing in San Jose, California (USA), Judge Lucy Koh said she was always “disturbed” by Google’s data collection activities. 25 whether Google is transparent in storing personal information. ![]() In theory, when incognito mode is enabled, the user’s browsing data will not be saved.īut a judge handling the data collection cases of Silicon Valley tech giants questioned on Feb.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |